|
AFHE Statement Regarding S.B. 1493 - Tuition Tax
Credit
Senator Ron Gould from Lake Havasu, Arizona recently introduced
a Tuition Tax Credit bill for homeschoolers (S.B. 1493). Arizona Families
for Home Education (AFHE) has met with Senator Gould and expressed our
concern over the effect that a tax credit law would have upon homeschooling
in our state. While AFHE appreciates the effort by Senator Gould to support
homeschooling families in Arizona, we cannot support S.B. 1493 at this
time because we are observing pending litigation in a related case.
Presently, Arizona law provides a tax credit for tuition expenditures
to a private school (ARS 43-1089) and for extra-curricular activities
at public schools (ARS 43-1089.01.) This law was passed in 1997 and immediately
a lawsuit was filed challenging its constitutionality under Arizona law.
The basis for the suit was that by diverting money owed the state in the
form of state income tax to private religious schools, the state was,
in essence, promoting a religious purpose and therefore in violation of
the State Constitution and the Establishment Clause of the Federal Constitution.
Known as Kotterman v. Killian, 193 Ariz. 273, 972 P.2d 606, the Arizona
Supreme Court upheld the tax credit law with regard to the question of
state constitutionality. The initiators of the Kotterman suit were individuals
who work for four organizations: the Arizona Education Association (state
branch of the National Education Association), the American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU,) People for the America Way, and Americans United for Separation
of Church and State.
Though disappointed by the favorable ruling in Kotterman, these same
entities were not deterred, and filled another suit, this time in the
Arizona District Court (which is a federal court) soon thereafter. Known
as Hibbs v. Winn this suit was brought primarily by the ACLU on behalf
of an Arizona taxpayer (Winn) against the director of the Arizona Department
of Revenue (Hibbs.) The basis of this case was two-fold. First, that the
tax-credit is an unconstitutional tax-scheme by a state, and therefore
the federal courts may review it and test its legality. Second, that the
law violates the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The District
Court upheld the tax-credit, but on appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of
Appeals, their decision was reversed thus siding with the ACLU viewpoint
(307 F.2d. 1011.) The State of Arizona appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme
Court and last June, they ruled upholding the Court of Appeals ruling
and remanding the case back to the Arizona District Court where it sits
now with a Motion to Dismiss pending.
Though wrapped up in a question of states’ rights, this case also
re-ignites the Establishment Clause issue which will not be addressed
until the tax question is decided. Arizona Families for Home Education
believes it is prudent to observe the outcome of this litigation challenging
the now 7 year-old private school tax credit law before we initiate new
legislation expanding Arizona law into our educational choice of homeschooling
via the same avenue of a tax credit. There is no doubt that the fate and
course of the tax credit law for private schools will influence the success
or failure of a homeschooling tax credit.
Arizona Families for Home Education has always supported all efforts
to empower parents in the choice of their child’s education. The
private school tax credit has furthered choice in our state which we view
as a positive outcome. However, homeschooling and private schools are
very different. Our past 25 year history in this state is one of fighting
for the legal right to homeschool, facing the attempts to dissuade parents
by imposing certification requirements to teach our children, refusing
to accept mandatory testing of our students using an imposed measuring
standard rather than one of our choice, and addressing recurring yearly
legislative challenges that attempt to chip away at our autonomy or make
things more difficult for our children due to our educational choice.
Although willing to explore new ways of supporting parents, we are not
eager to revisit any of the regulatory shackles or legitimacy debates
of the past. Thus, we take a conservative stance at this point in time
regarding Senator Gould’s bill and though we thank him for thinking
of ways in which homeschooling can be furthered in our state, we do not
urge that S.B. 1493 be passed. We wish to observe the outcome of the Hibbs
v. Winn case and any subsequent litigation before taking any action on
the question of a tax credit for homeschooling in Arizona.
AFHE Board of Directors
|